Attention, ce n'est pas un 2:35 natif.
Le Pana 3000 fait un zoom comme sauraient le faire les autres PJ mais là où il marque des points, c'est que vous n'aurez qu'à renseigner le PJ sur la taille de votre écran, enregistrer des points de focus (pour la netteté), enregistrer vos réglages dans un block mémoire et ensuite switcher entre le mode 16/9 et le 2:35 sans avoir à chaque fois à refaire le zoom et la netteté.
Mais il ne s'agit pas d'un vrai mode 2:35 natif.
Mais pour qui veut débuter en la matière, il pourra déjà avoir une première approche via ce dispositif.
L'extrait qui explique tout :
And finally we come to a feature which really surprised me; both in its implementation and the fact Panasonic have listened to what people are talking about in terms of home cinema projection – a 2.35:1 zoom feature.
This is being marketed as a budget option to using a cinemascope screen in your cinema room without the need to spend thousands on an anamorphic lens. Now you could do this with any projector on the market to be honest, you just zoom up the image and then fix the focus and off you go. But the draw back is having to manually zoom out again when you switch back to 16:9 material and re-focus the image. The neat thing here with the PT-AE3000 is that you enter the details of you screen and focus points into the memory banks of the projector and add a name to your settings. Then when you want to watch at 2.35:1 on your suitably sized screen you push a button and it does it for you automatically. Now I can hear some projector enthusiasts saying this is a cheat and you’re not using the full panel for the image and you will also lose some brightness, and yes, they are right. However when you factor in that a good quality anamorphic lens starts at around £3k and you also have to find a solution to move this in and out of the light path. So you can see why Panasonic have added the feature and to be honest I found it to be rather good in the image quality stakes with no real drop in quality of brightness. Indeed you could get better results with this option over buying a cheap anamorphic lens.
A+
» 19 Aoû 2008 8:36 
) et la photo est celle du 2000. 
