Tiens, le sommaire de son dernier bouquin:
Introduction
La croissance reviendra, puisqu’elle est indispensable
L’université pour tous, évidemment
Dormez tranquilles jusqu’en 2100
Solaire et éolien : comment faire sans ?
L’Allemagne, notre icône
Le charbon, c’est du passé !
Toujours plus de CO2
Écolo et pronucléaire ?
La crise de la dette, c’est la faute aux banques
Pétrole et Front national sont dans un bateau
Vous en reprendrez bien une louche ?
Le miracle de la croissance verte
Que le progrès soit avec toi
Internet nous sauvera !
Mais que font les Nations Unies ?
La concurrence ou l’environnement, il va falloir choisir
Le ministre et (l’oubli de) de la règle de trois
Conclusion
|
Modérateurs: Modération Forum Bla bla, Le Bureau de l’Association HCFR • Utilisateurs parcourant ce forum: Aucun utilisateur enregistré et 21 invités
Règles du forum
Merci de bien respecter la Charte HCFR, l'espace de loisirs proposé ici n'étant pas destiné à être un défouloir ou une foire d'empoigne.
Et pour mémoire, la Charte HCFR est directement consultable ici : Charte Forum HCFR
Merci de bien respecter la Charte HCFR, l'espace de loisirs proposé ici n'étant pas destiné à être un défouloir ou une foire d'empoigne.
Et pour mémoire, la Charte HCFR est directement consultable ici : Charte Forum HCFR
Transition énergétique et Environnement
- Joich
- Messages: 1132
- Inscription Forum: 11 Fév 2004 18:33
- Localisation: France d'en dessous
Faudrait pas trop me pousser
- Analogeek
- Messages: 1293
- Inscription Forum: 25 Oct 2007 12:09
- Localisation: 6-9 / 0-7
Joich a écrit:Et quand on voit les ordres de grandeur, on se rend bien compte que passer des hydrocarbure+nuke à du vent, du soleil et tout le reste, ça ne suffira qu'à moins de diviser la population mondiale par 10. Ce qui reste possible, hein
Oui c'est possible en utilisant une dernière fois le nuke (les bombes hein, pas les centrales).
- tfpsly
- Messages: 2700
- Inscription Forum: 16 Jan 2004 2:05
- Localisation: FR @ Zurich
Certes
- Joich
- Messages: 1132
- Inscription Forum: 11 Fév 2004 18:33
- Localisation: France d'en dessous
Bah c'est ce que je dis depuis pas mal de temps...Parler d'écologie et garder une croissance de population est un non sens complet.
Sauf que si on remet en cause la politique de natalité, c'est aussi accepter qu il faudra remettre en cause bon nombre de modèle économique et sociétaux.
Sauf que si on remet en cause la politique de natalité, c'est aussi accepter qu il faudra remettre en cause bon nombre de modèle économique et sociétaux.
- Kolian
- Messages: 8680
- Inscription Forum: 14 Nov 2005 12:57
Kolian a écrit:Bah c'est ce que je dis depuis pas mal de temps...Parler d'écologie et garder une croissance de population est un non sens complet.
Sauf que si on remet en cause la politique de natalité, c'est aussi accepter qu il faudra remettre en cause bon nombre de modèle économique et sociétaux.
... et accepter les migrations
- Joich
- Messages: 1132
- Inscription Forum: 11 Fév 2004 18:33
- Localisation: France d'en dessous
Bien évidemment
Phil
Phil
- adpcol
- Membre HCFR
- Messages: 30470
- Inscription Forum: 18 Mai 2004 7:58
- Localisation: 78
Ah oui mais non. Migration c'est un gros mot Sauf si c'est des riches qui vont faire fortune et finir leurs jours dans des pays pauvres. Là c'est pas une migration. C'est des expats
- Joich
- Messages: 1132
- Inscription Forum: 11 Fév 2004 18:33
- Localisation: France d'en dessous
Arrête de faire ton tiers-mondiste à 3 sous , comme si les causes et les conséquences étaient les mêmes ...
- poilau
- Messages: 4098
- Inscription Forum: 06 Avr 2003 22:20
- Localisation: 92200
poilau a écrit:Arrête de faire ton tiers-mondiste à 3 sous , comme si les causes et les conséquences étaient les mêmes ...
Deux sous ou dix sous? Parce que dix sous, c'est pas cher
Non, mais bon, c'est plus pour de rire, mais franchement, tu vois des gouvernements défendre un modèle planétaire qui mettrait un terme aux politiques natalistes (au moment où la Chine en finit avec la politique de l'enfant unique) tout en défendant une forte mobilité des personnes (donc des migrations)? C'est pas pour demain. On en est encore à soutenir la production de chair à canon
- Joich
- Messages: 1132
- Inscription Forum: 11 Fév 2004 18:33
- Localisation: France d'en dessous
UK government announces plans for small nuclear reactor programme
27 NOVEMBER 2015
UK chancellor George Osborne said on November 25 that at least £250m will be spent by 2020 on an ambitious programme to position the UK as a global leader in innovative nuclear technologies. The major part would be spent on identifying the best design of small modular reactors (SMRs) with a view to developing a commercial SMR manufacturing industry in the UK in the 2020s.
SMRs combine the main advantages of nuclear power – always online and low-carbon – while avoiding some of the problems, principally the vast cost and time taken to build huge plants such as the planned £16bn French-Chinese Hinkley Point C project in Somerset.
SMRs would each produce less than 300MW of electricity, compared with a planned output of 3,200MW at Hinkley Point C. An additional advantage is that SMRs can vary their output quickly, meaning they could be used to balance intermittent wind and solar energy, unlike larger nuclear plants, which take time to reduce or increase output.
The UK has commissioned five studies since July, costing £4.5m, to explore the potential of SMRs and energy secretary Amber Rudd told MPs earlier this month: “We are fully enthused about SMRs. We are doing as much as we can in terms of supporting the technology. SMRs would be an excellent way forward.”
A government-funded report from the UK’s National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) in December 2014 suggested there was potentially a “very significant” global market for hundreds of SMRs, with dozens in the UK. This market would be worth £250-£400bn, the NNL estimated, saying it represented an economic opportunity for UK plc.
Small reactors have been operated for more than 50 years, particularly on military submarines and ships, but this application is very different from civil nuclear electricity generation. They would be built on a production line to be transported to sites and plugged in, making them far cheaper than large nuclear power stations. They could be loaded on barges, linked to a grid in port and then floated back to the factory for refuelling.
The US nuclear giant Westinghouse, Fluor subsidiary NuScale, KAERI of South Korea and the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) are the main contenders in the race to develop a commercial SMR. Small reactors have operated at a remote site in Siberia since 1976, but no true factory-built SMRs have yet been built.
Tom Mundy, head of programme development at NuScale, said the UK was in pole position to develop this technology. “It’s got a government committed to reducing carbon and seeing nuclear as one of the solutions, and it has got a substantial and pre-eminent legacy of nuclear operations – a trained and capable workforce and a nuclear supply chain.”
NuScale has a 50MW design that would be transportable by road, with several reactors able to be installed side-by-side if more power is needed. The company is backed by a $217m cost-sharing deal from the US Department of Energy (DoE) and plans to start generating electricity for its first customer in Idaho in 2023.
Westinghouse, part of Toshiba and one of the world’s biggest nuclear companies, is offering a 225MW SMR, which it says could be deployed by 2027. The SMRs would be built in the UK and exported globally, and UK ministers are said to be looking closely at this offer.
Other SMR contenders include US-based Generation mPower, also backed by the US DoE, while more novel technology, such as that from Bill Gates-backed Terrapower, are seen as prospects further in the future. The pilot plant closest to completion is CAREM in Argentina, which was initially intended for use in submarines.
Contact Details and Archive...
• Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
27 NOVEMBER 2015
UK chancellor George Osborne said on November 25 that at least £250m will be spent by 2020 on an ambitious programme to position the UK as a global leader in innovative nuclear technologies. The major part would be spent on identifying the best design of small modular reactors (SMRs) with a view to developing a commercial SMR manufacturing industry in the UK in the 2020s.
SMRs combine the main advantages of nuclear power – always online and low-carbon – while avoiding some of the problems, principally the vast cost and time taken to build huge plants such as the planned £16bn French-Chinese Hinkley Point C project in Somerset.
SMRs would each produce less than 300MW of electricity, compared with a planned output of 3,200MW at Hinkley Point C. An additional advantage is that SMRs can vary their output quickly, meaning they could be used to balance intermittent wind and solar energy, unlike larger nuclear plants, which take time to reduce or increase output.
The UK has commissioned five studies since July, costing £4.5m, to explore the potential of SMRs and energy secretary Amber Rudd told MPs earlier this month: “We are fully enthused about SMRs. We are doing as much as we can in terms of supporting the technology. SMRs would be an excellent way forward.”
A government-funded report from the UK’s National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) in December 2014 suggested there was potentially a “very significant” global market for hundreds of SMRs, with dozens in the UK. This market would be worth £250-£400bn, the NNL estimated, saying it represented an economic opportunity for UK plc.
Small reactors have been operated for more than 50 years, particularly on military submarines and ships, but this application is very different from civil nuclear electricity generation. They would be built on a production line to be transported to sites and plugged in, making them far cheaper than large nuclear power stations. They could be loaded on barges, linked to a grid in port and then floated back to the factory for refuelling.
The US nuclear giant Westinghouse, Fluor subsidiary NuScale, KAERI of South Korea and the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) are the main contenders in the race to develop a commercial SMR. Small reactors have operated at a remote site in Siberia since 1976, but no true factory-built SMRs have yet been built.
Tom Mundy, head of programme development at NuScale, said the UK was in pole position to develop this technology. “It’s got a government committed to reducing carbon and seeing nuclear as one of the solutions, and it has got a substantial and pre-eminent legacy of nuclear operations – a trained and capable workforce and a nuclear supply chain.”
NuScale has a 50MW design that would be transportable by road, with several reactors able to be installed side-by-side if more power is needed. The company is backed by a $217m cost-sharing deal from the US Department of Energy (DoE) and plans to start generating electricity for its first customer in Idaho in 2023.
Westinghouse, part of Toshiba and one of the world’s biggest nuclear companies, is offering a 225MW SMR, which it says could be deployed by 2027. The SMRs would be built in the UK and exported globally, and UK ministers are said to be looking closely at this offer.
Other SMR contenders include US-based Generation mPower, also backed by the US DoE, while more novel technology, such as that from Bill Gates-backed Terrapower, are seen as prospects further in the future. The pilot plant closest to completion is CAREM in Argentina, which was initially intended for use in submarines.
Contact Details and Archive...
• Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
- Robert64
- Contributeur HCFR
- Messages: 5320
- Inscription Forum: 12 Sep 2006 15:40
- Localisation: Sud Ouest
L'avantage du réacteur sur une barge, c’est que si commence à chauffer, tu flanques tout ça au fond de l'eau et le problème de chauffe est réglé.
- gloinfred
- Messages: 5414
- Inscription Forum: 20 Mar 2008 16:15
- Localisation: Provence
Au SYMEVAD, plus grosse unité française d'injection de biométhane d'une capacité équivalente à la consommation de 2700 logements.
La production de méthane est réalisée à partir de déchets ménagers.
http://www.symevad.org/actualite/la-r%C3%A9cente-injection-de-biom%C3%A9thane-dans-le-r%C3%A9seau-grdf-marque-la-premi%C3%A8re-%C3%A9tape-du
La production de méthane est réalisée à partir de déchets ménagers.
http://www.symevad.org/actualite/la-r%C3%A9cente-injection-de-biom%C3%A9thane-dans-le-r%C3%A9seau-grdf-marque-la-premi%C3%A8re-%C3%A9tape-du
- alain_38
- Messages: 327
- Inscription Forum: 06 Avr 2011 16:55
- Localisation: Rhône-Alpes
Kolian a écrit:Bah c'est ce que je dis depuis pas mal de temps...Parler d'écologie et garder une croissance de population est un non sens complet.
Sauf que si on remet en cause la politique de natalité, c'est aussi accepter qu il faudra remettre en cause bon nombre de modèle économique et sociétaux.
La croissance démographique mondiale, ce ne sont pas les allocs en France qui la boostent, hein !
Quel modèle sociétal faut-il mettre en cause ? Celui, de la Chine, de l'Inde ou de l'Afrique ?
A+
- Robert64
- Contributeur HCFR
- Messages: 5320
- Inscription Forum: 12 Sep 2006 15:40
- Localisation: Sud Ouest
Celui du pétrole qui fait qu'on a la vie facile depuis 70 ans et que de fait on se comporte comme un parasite sans prédateur dans un milieu naturel ultra favorable
- Joich
- Messages: 1132
- Inscription Forum: 11 Fév 2004 18:33
- Localisation: France d'en dessous
|
Retourner vers Bla bla et Home-Cinema
|